Displaying 1 - 10 of 28 Forum Posts1 2 3 Next
  • Mar 30, 2021 07:54 PM
    Last: 1yr

    This is a challenging time for many families with children and while we're hoping for a return to normalcy sometime soon, we still aren't out of the woods yet. One thing that has been especially difficult during the past year is making sure enough food is on the table. When it comes to that, schools across America have really stepped up to make sure children who were on reduced or free lunch continued to get fed.

    If you didn't know about this program then it can't hurt to check out if your school is participating in it. Thankfully, the USDA, who runs the school lunch program, has a handy USDA Meals for Kids Site Finder that allows you to search for places in your area who are providing free and reduced priced meals for children.

    Who knows? Maybe there's a site just around the block from you?

  • Mar 28, 2021 06:31 PM
    Last: 1yr
    bryce28 Wrote: I think the main reason people think that is because of his age. He's already our oldest president on election day.

    True, but humans are also living longer than ever. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that a 78 year old President Biden is just a wee bit healthier than a 74 year old President Trump. Age alone isn't the biggest indicator of wellness and mental acuity.

    I honestly don't know if President Biden will run again, but he'd be crazy to say he's not going to this early on in his Administration.

  • Nov 28, 2016 11:09 AM
    Last: 6yr
    It looks like the Trump Administration decided to stop all advertising for the final week of signup, but you still have through the 31st to sign up for coverage. If you were planning on waiting till the last minute then it has arrived!
  • Dec 16, 2016 11:50 AM
    Last: 6yr

    I watched Tom Price's confirmation hearing and I have to admit that I wasn't terribly impressed with his answers regarding Medicare. He seemed unwilling (or unable) to answer basic questions about what should be done with Medicare and that worries me.

    Far too many people my age who have been paying into the program for decades are getting ready to start receiving our coverage and his inability to state emphatically that our coverage won't be tampered with really concerns me.

  • Jan 08, 2017 07:17 PM
    Last: 6yr

    Republicans have proposed to privatize Social Security since the George W Bush Administration and their newfound takeover of the Executive and Legislative branches of government gives them their first opportunity to deliver on that promise in over a decade. While they are salivating at the prospect of privatizing the decades old program, I surely hope they think twice before going through with it.

    Privatizing Social Security will bring in unnecessary and potentially dangerous risks to the safety net of tens of millions of Americans who have come to rely on their benefits for the majority of their retirement income. The 2008 financial crisis shows us that we can not always trust the private sector to make the best decisions. Imagine what would have happened to millions of seniors paychecks if their benefits were tied to the financial markets? The results would have been catastrophic.

    Instead of injecting risk into the system, Republicans should consider options that will actually tackle the Social Security Trust Fund's solvency issues. This would include raising the maximum taxable threshold of $127,200 and gradually increasing the age when individuals become eligible to receive their benefits. I fully understand that one is more controversial than the other, but I still think that both are a far better option than allowing the private market to gamble with the funds they receive.

    Does anyone agree with me or am I overlooking something about privatization that could be a benefit to the program?

  • Sep 19, 2016 02:18 PM
    Last: 6yr

    It's a simple question, but one I've been thinking a lot about lately. Presidential debates used to have far more weight riding on them then they do now and I'm beginning to wonder if they are even worth the hassle anymore.

    The vast majority of American voters will have made up their minds of who they will be voting for before Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump take the stage for the first of three scheduled debates on September 26th and, barring a colossal mess up on either candidates performance, those opinions aren't going to change.

    I understand it's important to see how the two candidates will perform on the debate stage, but in the age of talking points and talking past each other to get ones point across, I'm beginning to wonder if they are even worth it anymore.

    Does anyone agree with me or do you think the debates are still important to help you determine who you will be voting for?

  • Aug 24, 2016 05:16 PM
    Last: 5yr

    My wife and I had to place my mother-in-law in a nursing home ten years ago because her Alzheimer's made it impossible to live on her own and she seems to be quite content there. She receives the care she needs and calls her room home.

    It's was difficult at first, but we are now used to spending time with her there. We can even "sign her out" and take her out for a meal.

  • Jul 17, 2016 08:47 PM
    Last: 6yr
    J.K.Logic Wrote: First up, his wife. Here's Melania's full speech:

    Well that surely didn't go as they had hoped.

    Plagiarism is a big no-no in this day and age. They had to have known that there are teams of researchers and fact-checkers on the other side that is digesting each and every word and just waiting for someone to do something that will hurt their campaign.

    This is pretty much the worst thing that could have happened on the first day of the convention. And it was an entirely self-inflicted wound.

  • Jul 14, 2016 01:32 PM
    Last: 6yr

    Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump has picked Indiana Governor Mike Pence as his running mate, according to the Indianapolis Star and the New York Times.

    Governor Pence is a staunch conservative who will likely help assuage the fears of the base of the Republican Party who were hoping Mr. Trump would pick someone more aligned with the conservative wing of the party.

    I think this is a pretty safe pick for Trump because he needs the base of the party to come out in droves this November and a staunch conservative on the ticket will likely excite rank and file Republicans.

    Does anyone think this that Mr. Trump should have gone with someone else or do you think this was the best pick he could have made?

  • Apr 09, 2016 09:46 AM
    Last: 6yr
    J.K.Logic Wrote: I'm just now getting around to rounding everything up for filing. Happy I get the extra few days.

    I'm also a late filer. It's nice to have a few extra days this year. I'm hoping to get it done by Friday, but there's a pretty good chance I'll be heading to the post office Monday afternoon.